This is
interesting: Woman accused of breast-feeding while drunk. It’s pretty easy to imagine how a
police officer might feel compelled to arrest someone for doing this –
arresting people is often the default response for police. It’s what they do. On the other hand, I can’t see
that such an arrest will serve as a deterrent. To begin with, drunk people do bizarre and hazardous things
regardless of the law or the risk involved; that’s what being drunk is all
about. It’s what drunks do. Additionally, there has to be some
limit on things that parents can be punished for when it comes to their
children. I don’t know what that
limit is, but clearly we haven’t come anywhere near it. As things now stand, a parent can
legally fill their child’s head with bigoted, idiotic nonsense – will this
become a criminal offense? Will
exposing a child to second-hand smoke become a form of child endangerment? Or failing to have properly installed
smoke detectors? Leaving the life
vests on the shore? Under current law,
parents can be charged with a crime for not using Internet content filters:
exposing children to pornography is a no-no. Helmets, seatbelts and suchlike are also well-known areas of
enforced compliance. But for a
childless dimwit like myself, each new foray into the ambiguous limits of
parental responsibility is actually quite worrisome. It’s one of the many reasons that whenever I’m around
children I’m paralyzed with fear: I don’t know all the rules. None of us do. Thankfully there are lactating
drunkards out there risking the health of their babies so that we don’t have
to.
Comments